By Uche Nnadozie

The recent introduction of speed limit cameras in Lagos has sparked intense debate among residents, with some hailing it as a crucial road safety measure, while others view it as a thinly veiled revenue generation scheme.
As the Lagos State Government, under the leadership of Mr. Babajide Sanwo-Olu, continues to expand the camera system, it’s essential to examine the motivations behind this initiative and its potential positive impact on the state’s residents.
The government’s intentions are noble. The speed limit cameras are designed to detect over-speeding, a major cause of road accidents. By enforcing speed limits, the government aims to reduce accidents, save lives, and protect property. It also helps limit road rage, making our environment more friendly. Commissioner for Transportation, Mr. Oluwaseun Osiyemi emphasised that the system is not meant to be punitive but rather to encourage responsible driving.
Expectedly, many residents are skeptical about the government’s motives. Some argue that the cameras are primarily a revenue generation tool, citing the hefty fines imposed on violators. A ₦20,000 fine for running a red light and a ₦50,000 fine for exceeding speed limits seem excessive to many. The skepticism is fueled by the fact that governments worldwide often use traffic fines as a revenue source.
Another concern is the perceived lack of transparency and fairness in enforcement. Some residents question why commercial vehicles, notorious for reckless driving, seem to be exempt from the speed limit cameras. In a related media report, a resident pointed out that most commercial vehicles are rickety and lack proper documentation, yet they continue to pose a danger on the roads.
The government has responded to these concerns, clarifying that enforcement is currently limited to two major highways and that commercial vehicles are not exempt from the regulations.
Director of Public Affairs at the Ministry of Transportation, Mrs. Bolanle Ogunlola dismissed viral claims about widespread enforcement as false and misleading.
Despite these assurances, public skepticism remains high. To alleviate these concerns, the government must prioritize transparency and fairness in enforcement. This includes ensuring that all vehicles, including commercial buses and taxes, are subject to the same regulations and that speed limits are imposed based on national highway codes rather than for revenue generation.
It is also worth nothing that even if it adds to the state’s revenue, the technology-enabled process ensures that offenders pay the correct fees to the right government portal not to unscrupulous government agents who divert such payments to their pockets.
The state government’s efforts to improve road safety are commendable, but its essential to strike a balance between safety and revenue generation. By prioritising transparency, fairness, and public education, the government could build a solid trust base with residents and ensure the success of the speed limit camera and e-police initiatives.
As the camera system expands, motorists must stay informed and comply with traffic regulations to avoid penalties. The introduction of an online road worthiness re-certification system and an auto-verification service for used vehicles are welcome developments that will enhance efficiency and transparency in the entire transportation sector.
Ultimately, the success of the speed limit camera and the e-police initiatives depend on the government’s ability to address public concerns and prioritise road safety, including revenue generation. By doing so, Lagos can become a model for other states in Nigeria, demonstrating that effective road safety measures can be implemented without compromising the trust of its residents.